next »

['n ddrylliog]

Hey Marvin !

Here is the small bug showcase program about Links.

You should see a square of 25x25 small digibots, while you can only see one at a time.

Could you take a look at it ?

(Note : there are several classes, it's the "Links" class)

[Marvin Fröhlich]

Fixed . Anyway you seem to have a calculation bug in the rotation code. The bots disappear after the rotation succeeds 120 degrees. I am too tired to look deeper into it. But I'm sure, you will find it. Otherwise we can discuss it tomorrow.

btw. Why did you send all these classes? They are not needed by the Links test.

Marvin

['n ddrylliog]

Thanks, I'll test it now.

btw. Why did you send all these classes? They are not needed by the Links test.

I have a "test" project in Eclipse where all goes before being committed to the xith-tk and where I put all small test programs (ex. jar manipulation, bug showcases, etc..)

[Marvin Fröhlich]

Sorry. The disappearing when rotated 120 degrees actially was in the SceneGraph code (Links/SharedGroups + Bounds). Strange, that it hasn't been faced earlier . Anyway it's fixed now.

Marvin

['n ddrylliog]

Sorry. The disappearing when rotated 120 degrees actially was in the SceneGraph code (Links/SharedGroups + Bounds). Strange, that it hasn't been faced earlier . Anyway it's fixed now.

Thanks lot.

It would have surprised me that it would have been a bug in the rotation code, since it's simply sin/cos, nothing could be simpler..

[Marvin Fröhlich]

It would have surprised me that it would have been a bug in the rotation code, since it's simply sin/cos, nothing could be simpler..

Well, I could imaging even simpler code, but not much .

Marvin

['n ddrylliog]

It would have surprised me that it would have been a bug in the rotation code, since it's simply sin/cos, nothing could be simpler..

Well, I could imaging even simpler code, but not much .

Sometimes simpler means shorter means less clear, and in that case I do not shorten the code.

[Marvin Fröhlich]

Sometimes simpler means shorter means less clear, and in that case I do not shorten the code.

Well, that was not what I meant with my little joke. I was taking about something like an addition or subtraction (which is certainly simpler than sin/cos) .

['n ddrylliog]

Sometimes simpler means shorter means less clear, and in that case I do not shorten the code.

Well, that was not what I meant with my little joke. I was taking about something like an addition or subtraction (which is certainly simpler than sin/cos) .

Well, the day you're able to do rotation with only additions and subtractions, call me